On Friday 09 February 2007 19:21, Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Friday 09 February 2007 23:22, Joseph Jezak wrote:
> >>> Well, I don't review the rest until you say to which specs you did the 
> >>> changes. ;)
> >> http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/B5PHY
> >>
> >> Larry was working from the old specs, so when I updated it, I only 
> >> updated the old specs.  I'll fix the v4 specs soon.
> > 
> > Ah, ok. I think we should decide on which specs carry most recent 
> > information.
> > I think v3 specs should be considered obsolete and new information/ fixes
> > should go into v4. It is already too confusing where to find newest 
> > information
> > to a certain thing.
> > 
> 
> I'll agree to that as long as there is a clear indication of any differences 
> between V3 and V4 firmware.

Well, the difference between v3 and v4 is:
* The SHM API.
* v4 may include less BPHY stuff, as broadcom's v4 drivers don't include BHY 
anymore.

So I'd say for everything bug BPHY the v4 specs should be considered latest.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to