On 8/29/19 3:52 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:27:08 -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
+static void ionic_lif_qcq_deinit(struct ionic_lif *lif, struct ionic_qcq *qcq)
+{
+ struct ionic_dev *idev = &lif->ionic->idev;
+ struct device *dev = lif->ionic->dev;
+
+ if (!qcq)
+ return;
+
+ ionic_debugfs_del_qcq(qcq);
+
+ if (!(qcq->flags & IONIC_QCQ_F_INITED))
+ return;
+
+ if (qcq->flags & IONIC_QCQ_F_INTR) {
+ ionic_intr_mask(idev->intr_ctrl, qcq->intr.index,
+ IONIC_INTR_MASK_SET);
+ synchronize_irq(qcq->intr.vector);
+ devm_free_irq(dev, qcq->intr.vector, &qcq->napi);
Doesn't free_irq() basically imply synchronize_irq()?
The synchronize_irq() waits for any threaded handlers to finish, while
free_irq() only waits for HW handling. This helps makes sure we don't
have anything still running before we remove resources.
sln
+ netif_napi_del(&qcq->napi);
+ }
+
+ qcq->flags &= ~IONIC_QCQ_F_INITED;