Mike Accetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Obviously the code believes it can assume that there are always multiple > sk_buff's in the chain. The stack trace seems to implicate iptables in > the scenario (twice) if that means anything. Any ideas about what may > be going wrong here? There is indeed a private module loaded at the time > but it does no networking and I doubt it is the culprit.
Yeah we should never get here if we only have one segment. Could you get it to print out the value of skb->gso_*? Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
