From: Vlad Buslov <vla...@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:44:56 +0300

> Implement following cls API changes:
> 
> - Introduce new "unlocked_driver_cb" flag to struct flow_block_offload
>   to allow registering and unregistering block hardware offload
>   callbacks that do not require caller to hold rtnl lock. Drivers that
>   doesn't require users of its tc offload callbacks to hold rtnl lock
>   sets the flag to true on block bind/unbind. Internally tcf_block is
>   extended with additional lockeddevcnt counter that is used to count
>   number of devices that require rtnl lock that block is bound to. When
>   this counter is zero, tc_setup_cb_*() functions execute callbacks
>   without obtaining rtnl lock.
> 
> - Extend cls API single hardware rule update tc_setup_cb_call() function
>   with tc_setup_cb_add(), tc_setup_cb_replace(), tc_setup_cb_destroy()
>   and tc_setup_cb_reoffload() functions. These new APIs are needed to
>   move management of block offload counter, filter in hardware counter
>   and flag from classifier implementations to cls API, which is now
>   responsible for managing them in concurrency-safe manner. Access to
>   cb_list from callback execution code is synchronized by obtaining new
>   'cb_lock' rw_semaphore in read mode, which allows executing callbacks
>   in parallel, but excludes any modifications of data from
>   register/unregister code. tcf_block offloads counter type is changed
>   to atomic integer to allow updating the counter concurrently.
> 
> - Extend classifier ops with new ops->hw_add() and ops->hw_del()
>   callbacks which are used to notify unlocked classifiers when filter is
>   successfully added or deleted to hardware without releasing cb_lock.
>   This is necessary to update classifier state atomically with callback
>   list traversal and updating of all relevant counters and allows
>   unlocked classifiers to synchronize with concurrent reoffload without
>   requiring any changes to driver callback API implementations.
 ...

Looks good, series applied, thanks.

Reply via email to