On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:12:14 -0400 Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In fact you're also relying on -ENODEV, which is what you return here (and in > other places) instead of 0. So I'm afraid you have to address my comment > now... Vivien, you are right. I returned -ENODEV for Peridot when no lane was to be on port. It should return 0. I am sending v4 now with this corrected, and tested on Turris Mox with combinations Peridot, Topaz and Peridot + Topaz. Marek
