From: Michael Chan <michael.c...@broadcom.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 23:54:54 -0400
> @@ -687,6 +687,32 @@ static int bnxt_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs)
> return bnxt_hwrm_func_cfg(bp, num_vfs);
> }
>
> +int bnxt_cfg_hw_sriov(struct bnxt *bp, int *num_vfs)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* Register buffers for VFs */
> + rc = bnxt_hwrm_func_buf_rgtr(bp);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* Reserve resources for VFs */
> + rc = bnxt_func_cfg(bp, *num_vfs);
> + if (rc != *num_vfs) {
I notice that these two operations are reversed here from where they were in the
bnxt_sriov_enable() function. Does the BUF_RGTR operation have to be undone if
the bnxt_func_cfg() fails?
When it's not a straight extraction of code into a helper function one really
should do one of two things in my opinion:
1) Explain the differences in the commit message.
2) Do a straight extration in one commit, change the ordering in another.
