From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:55:39 +0900 (JST)
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:32:11 +0000), David
> Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > (2) A local address can optionally be bound:
> >
> > struct sockaddr_rxrpc srx = {
> > .srx_family = AF_RXRPC,
> > .srx_service = 0, /* we're a client */
> > .transport_type = SOCK_DGRAM, /* type of transport socket */
> > .transport.sin_family = AF_INET,
> > .transport.sin_port = htons(7000), /* AFS callback */
> > .transport.sin_address = 0, /* all local interfaces */
> > };
>
> This sockaddr_rxrpc{} should NOT include sockaddr_in{} directly.
> Please use sockaddr_storage{} (or sockaddr{}, maybe), and make it
> sure to align on 64-bit word.
This is correct.
David, we should make the suggested changes in order to support IPv6
(and theoretically other address families as the transport) cleanly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
