Copy-paste of existing test "calls: cross frame pruning - liveness propagation" but ran with different parentage chain heuristic which stresses different path in precision tracking logic.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org> --- This test will be failing without this fix https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1151172/ --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c index a20953c23721..a455a4a71f11 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c @@ -115,3 +115,28 @@ regs=300 stack=0 before 17\ parent already had regs=0 stack=0 marks", }, +{ + "precise: cross frame pruning", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 1), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_8, 1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, + .errstr = "!read_ok", + .result = REJECT, +}, -- 2.20.0
