On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:18:30 -0700, John Fastabend wrote: > > > I suspect you've triaged through this already on your side for other > > > reasons, so perhaps you could help come up with a sane set of TLS > > > bug fix backports that would be appropriate for -stable? > > > > I'm planning to spend tomorrow working exactly on v4.19 backport. > > I have internal reports of openssl failing on v4.19 while v4.20 > > works fine.. Hopefully I'll be able to figure that one out, test the > > above and see if there are any other missing fixes. > > > > Is it okay if I come back to this tomorrow? > > Is the failure with hw offload or sw case?
SW case, strangely enough. Large file transfer, I think with openssl client.. > If its sendpage related looks like we also need to push the following > patch back to 4.19, > > commit 648ee6cea7dde4a5cdf817e5d964fd60b22006a4 > Author: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed Jun 12 17:23:57 2019 +0000 > > net: tls, correctly account for copied bytes with multiple sk_msgs I had a quick look at that, but the commit in Fixes is not in v4.19. > If you have more details I can also spend some cycles looking into it. Awesome, I'll let you know what the details are as soon as I get them.
