From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:41:21 +0200
> Move DSACK code outside the SACK fast-path checking code. If the DSACK > determined that the information was too old we stayed with a partial cache > copied. Most likely this matters very little since the next packet will not be > DSACK and we will find it in the cache. but it's still not good form and there > is little reason to couple the two checks. > > Since the SACK receive cache doesn't need the data to be in host order we also > remove the ntohl in the checking loop. > > Signed-Off-By: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks for fixing up the endianness annotations, applied. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
