Hi Dave, > -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:34 AM > To: jakub.kicin...@netronome.com > Cc: j...@resnulli.us; Parav Pandit <pa...@mellanox.com>; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>; Saeed Mahameed > <sae...@mellanox.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] devlink: Introduce PCI PF, VF ports and > attributes > > From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:20:58 -0700 > > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:17:11 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> >But I'll leave it to Jiri and Dave to decide if its worth a respin > >> >:) Functionally I think this is okay. > >> > >> I'm happy with the set as it is right now. > > > > To be clear, I am happy enough as well. Hence the review tag. > > Series applied, thanks everyone. > > >> Anyway, if you want your concerns to be addresses, you should write > >> them to the appropriate code. This list is hard to follow. > > > > Sorry, I was trying to be concise. > > Jiri et al., if Jakub put forth the time and effort to make the list and give > you > feedback you can put forth the effort to go through the list and address his > feedback with follow-up patches. You cannot dictate how people give > feedback to your changes, thank you.
I will be happy to write follow up patches. mostly in kernel 5.4, I will be adding mdev (mediated device) port flavour as discussed in past. I will possibly write up follow up patch or two before posting them or have it in that series, as it will extend this devlink code further.
