From: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 20:13:22 +0100
> we do have an RCU-delayed part there already (freeing the wq), > so it's not like the pipe situation; moreover, it might be > worth considering coallocating wq with the rest of struct sock_alloc. > ->sk_wq in struct sock would remain a pointer as it is, but > the object it normally points to would be coallocated with > struct socket... > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Applied.
