On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 01:23:02 +0200, vto...@googlemail.com wrote:
> A simple soul might infer that mv88e6xxx includes MV88E6060, at least
> that happened to me apparently (being said simpleton).
I agree that is confusing, that is why I don't like the 'xxx' naming
convention in general, found in many drivers. I'd prefer to stick with a
reference model, or product category, like soho in this case. But it was
initially written like this, so no reason to change its name now. I still
plan to merge mv88e6060 into mv88e6xxx, but it is unfortunately low priority
because I still don't have a platform with a 88E6060 on it.
Thanks,
Vivien
