From: Eran Ben Elisha <era...@mellanox.com>
When polling a CQE of an SKB-less WQE, don't assume it consumed only
one WQEBB. Use wi->num_wqebbs directly instead.
In the downstream patch, SKB-less WQEs might have more the one WQEBB,
thus this change is needed.
Signed-off-by: Eran Ben Elisha <era...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tar...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
index 983ea6206a94..9740ca51921d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
@@ -485,8 +485,8 @@ bool mlx5e_poll_tx_cq(struct mlx5e_cq *cq, int napi_budget)
wi = &sq->db.wqe_info[ci];
skb = wi->skb;
- if (unlikely(!skb)) { /* nop */
- sqcc++;
+ if (unlikely(!skb)) {
+ sqcc += wi->num_wqebbs;
continue;
}
--
1.8.3.1
