From: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:40:45 +0200

> netfilter did not expect that skb_dst_force() can cause skb to lose its
> dst entry.
> 
> I got a bug report with a skb->dst NULL dereference in netfilter
> output path.  The backtrace contains nf_reinject(), so the dst might have
> been cleared when skb got queued to userspace.
> 
> Other users were fixed via
> if (skb_dst(skb)) {
>       skb_dst_force(skb);
>       if (!skb_dst(skb))
>               goto handle_err;
> }
> 
> But I think its preferable to make the 'dst might be cleared' part
> of the function explicit.
> 
> In netfilter case, skb with a null dst is expected when queueing in
> prerouting hook, so drop skb for the other hooks.
> 
> v2:
>  v1 of this patch returned true in case skb had no dst entry.
>  Eric said:
>    Say if we have two skb_dst_force() calls for some reason
>    on the same skb, only the first one will return false.
> 
>  This now returns false even when skb had no dst, as per Erics
>  suggestion, so callers might need to check skb_dst() first before
>  skb_dst_force().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
 ...
>  Alternatively this could be routed via netfilter tree, let me
>  know your preference.

Applied and I'll queue this up for -stable, thanks Florian.

Reply via email to