> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Westphal [mailto:f...@strlen.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 12:19
> To: Ran Rozenstein <ra...@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Tariq Toukan <tar...@mellanox.com>; Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; Maor Gottlieb <ma...@mellanox.com>;
> eduma...@google.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: ipv4: remove erroneous
> advancement of list pointer
>
> Ran Rozenstein <ra...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/17/2019 5:02 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > Tariq reported a soft lockup on net-next that Mellanox was able to
> > > > bisect to 2638eb8b50cf ("net: ipv4: provide __rcu annotation for
> ifa_list").
> > > >
> > > > While reviewing above patch I found a regression when addresses
> > > > have a lifetime specified.
> > > >
> > > > Second patch extends rtnetlink.sh to trigger crash (without first
> > > > patch applied).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks Florian.
> > >
> > > Ran, can you please test?
> >
> > Tested, still reproduce.
>
> Can you be a little more specific? Is there any reproducer?
The test dose stress on the interface by running this 2 commands in loop:
command is: /sbin/ip -f inet addr add $IP/16 brd + dev ens8f1
command is: ifconfig ens8f1 $IP netmask 255.255.0.0
when $IP change every iteration.
It execute every second when we see the reproduce somewhere between 40 to 200
seconds of execution.
Thanks,
Ran
