On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:

> It looks like phy_timer has changed a bit in 2.6.20-rc6, what exactly was the
> intent of these changes?

 As I wrote, I'll have a look at these patches after 2.6.20 again.  These 
bits are from September (see the timestamps) and some of them may well 
have become irrelevant.

 The additional timeout was meant to let the driver go back to 
autonegotiation once a cycle through all the forced speeds has failed.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to