On 6/15/19 8:07 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > Extend the IPv6 FIB notifier info with number of sibling routes being > notified. > > This will later allow listeners to process one notification for a > multipath routes instead of N, where N is the number of nexthops. > > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> > --- > include/net/ip6_fib.h | 7 +++++++ > net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) >
The need for a second notifier stems from the append case? versus using call_fib6_entry_notifiers and letting the nsiblings fallout from rt->fib6_nsiblings? The append case is a weird thing for userspace to maintain order, but it seems like the offload case should not care. Also, .multipath_rt seems redundant with .nsiblings > 1
