On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:50 AM David Lebrun <dav.leb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 07/06/2019 19:55, Tom Herbert wrote: > > -#define SR6_TLV_PADDING 4 > > From a uapi perspective, should we rather keep the definition and mark > it as obsoleted as for the rest of the TLV types ? > Yes, that is an omission.
> Note that I'm fine with both.
