On 05/24/2019 11:39 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/23/2019 11:47 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> This patch tries to solve the following specific use case.
>>
>> Currently, bpf program can already collect stack traces
>> through kernel function get_perf_callchain()
>> when certain events happens (e.g., cache miss counter or
>> cpu clock counter overflows). But such stack traces are
>> not enough for jitted programs, e.g., hhvm (jited php).
>> To get real stack trace, jit engine internal data structures
>> need to be traversed in order to get the real user functions.
>>
>> bpf program itself may not be the best place to traverse
>> the jit engine as the traversing logic could be complex and
>> it is not a stable interface either.
>>
>> Instead, hhvm implements a signal handler,
>> e.g. for SIGALARM, and a set of program locations which
>> it can dump stack traces. When it receives a signal, it will
>> dump the stack in next such program location.
>>
>> Such a mechanism can be implemented in the following way:
>>   . a perf ring buffer is created between bpf program
>>     and tracing app.
>>   . once a particular event happens, bpf program writes
>>     to the ring buffer and the tracing app gets notified.
>>   . the tracing app sends a signal SIGALARM to the hhvm.
>>
>> But this method could have large delays and causing profiling
>> results skewed.
>>
>> This patch implements bpf_send_signal() helper to send
>> a signal to hhvm in real time, resulting in intended stack traces.
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
>> ---
>>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 17 +++++++++-
>>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 63e0cf66f01a..68d4470523a0 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -2672,6 +2672,20 @@ union bpf_attr {
>>   *          0 on success.
>>   *
>>   *          **-ENOENT** if the bpf-local-storage cannot be found.
>> + *
>> + * int bpf_send_signal(u32 sig)
>> + *  Description
>> + *          Send signal *sig* to the current task.
>> + *  Return
>> + *          0 on success or successfully queued.
>> + *
>> + *          **-EBUSY** if work queue under nmi is full.
>> + *
>> + *          **-EINVAL** if *sig* is invalid.
>> + *
>> + *          **-EPERM** if no permission to send the *sig*.
>> + *
>> + *          **-EAGAIN** if bpf program can try again.
>>   */
>>  #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)               \
>>      FN(unspec),                     \
>> @@ -2782,7 +2796,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
>>      FN(strtol),                     \
>>      FN(strtoul),                    \
>>      FN(sk_storage_get),             \
>> -    FN(sk_storage_delete),
>> +    FN(sk_storage_delete),          \
>> +    FN(send_signal),
>>  
>>  /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
>>   * function eBPF program intends to call
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> index f92d6ad5e080..70029eafc71f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> @@ -567,6 +567,63 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto 
>> bpf_probe_read_str_proto = {
>>      .arg3_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
>>  };
>>  
>> +struct send_signal_irq_work {
>> +    struct irq_work irq_work;
>> +    struct task_struct *task;
>> +    u32 sig;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct send_signal_irq_work, send_signal_work);
>> +
>> +static void do_bpf_send_signal(struct irq_work *entry)
>> +{
>> +    struct send_signal_irq_work *work;
>> +
>> +    work = container_of(entry, struct send_signal_irq_work, irq_work);
>> +    group_send_sig_info(work->sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, work->task, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>> +}
>> +
>> +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_send_signal, u32, sig)
>> +{
>> +    struct send_signal_irq_work *work = NULL;
>> +

Oh, and one more thing:

        if (!valid_signal(sig))
                return -EINVAL;

Otherwise when deferring the work, you don't have any such feedback.

>> +    /* Similar to bpf_probe_write_user, task needs to be
>> +     * in a sound condition and kernel memory access be
>> +     * permitted in order to send signal to the current
>> +     * task.
>> +     */
>> +    if (unlikely(current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_EXITING)))
>> +            return -EPERM;
>> +    if (unlikely(uaccess_kernel()))
>> +            return -EPERM;
>> +    if (unlikely(!nmi_uaccess_okay()))
>> +            return -EPERM;
>> +
>> +    if (in_nmi()) {
>> +            work = this_cpu_ptr(&send_signal_work);
>> +            if (work->irq_work.flags & IRQ_WORK_BUSY)
> 
> Given here and in stackmap are the only two users outside of 
> kernel/irq_work.c,
> it may probably be good to add a small helper to include/linux/irq_work.h and
> use it for both.
> 
> Perhaps something like ...
> 
> static inline bool irq_work_busy(struct irq_work *work)
> {
>       return READ_ONCE(work->flags) & IRQ_WORK_BUSY;
> }
> 
>> +                    return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> +            /* Add the current task, which is the target of sending signal,
>> +             * to the irq_work. The current task may change when queued
>> +             * irq works get executed.
>> +             */
>> +            work->task = current;
>> +            work->sig = sig;
>> +            irq_work_queue(&work->irq_work);
>> +            return 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return group_send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, current, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_proto = {
>> +    .func           = bpf_send_signal,
>> +    .gpl_only       = false,
>> +    .ret_type       = RET_INTEGER,
>> +    .arg1_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const struct bpf_func_proto *
>>  tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>  {
>> @@ -617,6 +674,8 @@ tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const 
>> struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>      case BPF_FUNC_get_current_cgroup_id:
>>              return &bpf_get_current_cgroup_id_proto;
>>  #endif
>> +    case BPF_FUNC_send_signal:
>> +            return &bpf_send_signal_proto;
>>      default:
>>              return NULL;
>>      }
>> @@ -1343,5 +1402,18 @@ static int __init bpf_event_init(void)
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int __init send_signal_irq_work_init(void)
>> +{
>> +    int cpu;
>> +    struct send_signal_irq_work *work;
>> +
>> +    for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> +            work = per_cpu_ptr(&send_signal_work, cpu);
>> +            init_irq_work(&work->irq_work, do_bpf_send_signal);
>> +    }
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  fs_initcall(bpf_event_init);
>> +subsys_initcall(send_signal_irq_work_init);
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>>
> 

Reply via email to