On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 4:26 AM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I review the reps of netronome nfp codes, nfp does't set the > NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL to netdev->features. > And I changed the OFED codes which used for our product environment, > and then send this patch to upstream. The real question here is if we can provide the required separation when vport rep netdevs are put into different name-spaces -- this needs deeper thinking. Technically you can do that with this one liner patch but we have to see if/what assumptions could be broken as of that.
