On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:40 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:41:45AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > In the future we'll likely need some layering to support the 8385 > > SDIO/CF variant, but most likely not in way the USB support is currently > > excessively layered and abstracted. > > Yeah. Let's summarize my unfortunately a bit too nasty comments and > your more helpfull replies :-) > > This driver still needs a lot more work, both to cleanup a lot of crap > and integreate it better with the wireless stack. And OLPC needs this > is not going to be an excuse of it's own.
Of course; the we-need-it-now-so-you-take-it-now attitude never gets vendors or anyone else anywhere, so there's no reason to expect it would work for OLPC either. OLPC does not need, nor does any of us who work on it ask for, special treatment. Stuff will go through the correct channels and will follow the normal kernel process. That's all we can expect, and that's all we ask. Cheers, Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html