On 5/4/19 12:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.05.19 um 18:32 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
>> On 5/4/19 12:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> ok, so the answer is no
>>>
>>> what's the point then release every 2 days a new "stable" kernel?
>>> even distributions like Fedora are not able to cope with that
>>
>> That is a question for distros, not for netdev@ ?
>
> maybe, but the point is that we go in a direction where you have every 2
> or 3 days a "stable" update up to days where at 9:00 AM a "stable" point
> release appears at kernel.org and one hour later the next one from Linus
> himself to fix a regression in the release an hour ago
>
> release-realy-release-often is fine, but that smells like rush and
> nobody downstream be it a sysadmin or a distribution can cope with that
> when you are in a testing stage a while start deploy there are 2 new
> releases with a long changelog
>
> just because you never know if what you intended to deploy now better
> should be skipped or joust go ahead because the next one a few days
> later brings a regression and which ones are the regressions adn which
> ones are the fixes which for me personally now leads to just randomly
> update every few weaks
>
In any case, this discussion has nothing to do with netdev@
Are you suggesting that we should not fix bugs at given period of times,
just because a 'release of some stable kernel' happened one day before ?
How you do your updates does not really concern us, sorry !
