Hello Jakub, > The split into patches is slightly imperfect here. > > Patch 10 "introduces" a mutex, which nothing is using, yet. > > Patch 11 starts some async work, which the mutex is needed for. > > Patches 12 and 13 wrap other FW call sites... > > Isn't it better to squash 12 and 13 into 10, this way 11 is safe > to access FW from the work queue? >
Thanks, you are right, will do. Regards, Igor
