On 4/23/19 12:36 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
> 
> With current number of spaces the output is mangled if the shared buffer
> is congested.
> 
> Before:
> 
> # devlink sb occupancy show swp32
> swp32:
>   pool: 0:    10220112/10222128 1:          0/0       2:          0/0       
> 3:          0/0
>         4:    10221120/10222128 5:          0/0       6:          0/0       
> 7:          0/0
>         8:      41328/46368   9:          0/0      10:          0/0
>   itc:  0(0): 10220112/10222128 1(0):       0/0       2(0):       0/0       
> 3(0):       0/0
>         4(0):       0/0       5(0):       0/0       6(0):       0/0       
> 7(0):       0/0
>   etc:  0(4): 10221120/10222128 1(4):       0/0       2(4):       0/0       
> 3(4):       0/0
>         4(4):       0/0       5(4):       0/0       6(4):       0/0       
> 7(4):       0/0
>         8(8):   43344/46368   9(8):       0/0      10(8):       0/0      
> 11(8):       0/0
>        12(8):       0/0      13(8):       0/0      14(8):       0/0      
> 15(8):       0/0
> 
> After:
> 
> # devlink sb occupancy show swp32
> swp32:
>   pool: 0:    10220112/10222128 1:          0/0         2:          0/0       
>   3:          0/0
>         4:    10221120/10222128 5:          0/0         6:          0/0       
>   7:          0/0
>         8:      41328/46368     9:          0/0        10:          0/0
>   itc:  0(0): 10220112/10222128 1(0):       0/0         2(0):       0/0       
>   3(0):       0/0
>         4(0):       0/0         5(0):       0/0         6(0):       0/0       
>   7(0):       0/0
>   etc:  0(4): 10221120/10222128 1(4):       0/0         2(4):       0/0       
>   3(4):       0/0
>         4(4):       0/0         5(4):       0/0         6(4):       0/0       
>   7(4):       0/0
>         8(8):   43344/46368     9(8):       0/0        10(8):       0/0       
>  11(8):       0/0
>        12(8):       0/0        13(8):       0/0        14(8):       0/0       
>  15(8):       0/0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
> Reported-by: Alex Kushnarov <alexand...@mellanox.com>
> Tested-by: Alex Kushnarov <alexand...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  devlink/devlink.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/devlink/devlink.c b/devlink/devlink.c
> index dc6e73fec20c..1306c4c126ad 100644
> --- a/devlink/devlink.c
> +++ b/devlink/devlink.c
> @@ -3422,7 +3422,7 @@ static void pr_out_occ_show_item_list(const char 
> *label, struct list_head *list,
>                                 occ_item->bound_pool_index);
>               else
>                       pr_out_sp(7, "%2u:", occ_item->index);
> -             pr_out_sp(15, "%7u/%u", occ_item->cur, occ_item->max);
> +             pr_out_sp(17, "%7u/%u", occ_item->cur, occ_item->max);
>               if (i++ % 4 == 0)
>                       pr_out("\n");
>       }
> 

2 more columns fixes the current problem, what assurances are there that
the occupancy levels and max won't reach 100 million in the next few years?

Reply via email to