On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:01 AM Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@netronome.com> wrote: > > > Alexei Starovoitov writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:59:37PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote: > >> There are a few "regs[regno]" here are there across "check_reg_arg", this > >> patch factor it out into a simple "reg" pointer. The intention is to > >> simplify code indentation and make the later patches in this set look > >> cleaner. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@netronome.com> > > > > The first 4 patches look great, so I've applied them to bpf-next. > > Thanks. > > > The rest needs more careful review that we'll do soon. > > No problem and agree they need very careful review. I understand once > landed the optimization will be always on for a couple of targets like Arm, > PowerPC and SPARC etc, so the correctness is critical. > > Patch 5 has two comments from Jakub not addressed, they are not about > correctness so should not affect the review, I will fix them together with > the other new comments. > > One good thing is high 32-bit randomization does catch a couple of corner > case bugs so prove to be very powerful and efficient for exposing bugs. In > v3, it is enabled on all possible tests under bpf selftests, and I haven't > noticed regressions (my local machine configure may caused some tests > skipped, but majority of the testsuite, especially all tests under > test_progs/test_progs_32/test_verifier ran without failure), this is a good > assurance of correctness.
Sounds great, but please respin the rest of patches with comments addressed. Don't worry about spamming the mailing list.
