On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:23 AM Quentin Monnet
<quentin.mon...@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> 2019-04-11 17:03 UTC+0900 ~ Benjamin Poirier <bpoir...@suse.com>
> > The test meant to use the saved value of errno. Given the current code, it
> > makes no practical difference however.
> >
> > Fixes: bf598a8f0f77 ("bpftool: Improve handling of ENOENT on map dumps")
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoir...@suse.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com>

> > ---
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> > index e0c650d91784..05b029b934a6 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> > @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static int dump_map_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value,
> >               jsonw_string_field(json_wtr, "error", strerror(lookup_errno));
> >               jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
> >       } else {
> > -             if (errno == ENOENT)
> > +             if (lookup_errno == ENOENT)
> >                       print_entry_plain(map_info, key, NULL);
> >               else
> >                       print_entry_error(map_info, key,
> >
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.mon...@netronome.com>

Reply via email to