This patch randomizes high 32-bit of a definition when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32
is set.

It does this once the flag set no matter there is hardware zero extension
support or not. Because this is a test feature and we want to deliver the
most stressful test.

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@netronome.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9141a9a..33407c5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7520,24 +7520,70 @@ static int opt_remove_nops(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+                                        const union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
        struct bpf_insn_aux_data orig_aux, *aux = env->insn_aux_data;
+       struct bpf_insn *patch, zext_patch[3], rnd_hi32_patch[4];
+       int i, patch_len, delta = 0, len = env->prog->len;
        struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi;
-       int i, delta = 0, len = env->prog->len;
-       struct bpf_insn zext_patch[3];
        struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
+       bool rnd_hi32;
+
+       rnd_hi32 = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32;
 
        zext_patch[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, 0, 32);
        zext_patch[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, 0, 32);
+       rnd_hi32_patch[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_AX, 0);
+       rnd_hi32_patch[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_AX, 32);
+       rnd_hi32_patch[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, 0, BPF_REG_AX);
        for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
                int adj_idx = i + delta;
                struct bpf_insn insn;
 
-               if (!aux[adj_idx].zext_dst)
+               insn = insns[adj_idx];
+               if (!aux[adj_idx].zext_dst) {
+                       u8 code, class;
+                       u32 imm_rnd;
+
+                       if (!rnd_hi32)
+                               continue;
+
+                       code = insn.code;
+                       class = BPF_CLASS(code);
+                       /* Insns doesn't define any value. */
+                       if (class == BPF_JMP || class == BPF_JMP32 ||
+                           class == BPF_STX || class == BPF_ST)
+                               continue;
+
+                       /* NOTE: arg "reg" is only used for BPF_STX, as it has
+                        *       been ruled out in above check, it is safe to
+                        *       pass NULL here.
+                        */
+                       if (is_reg64(env, &insn, insn.dst_reg, NULL, DST_OP)) {
+                               if (class == BPF_LD &&
+                                   BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_IMM)
+                                       i++;
+                               continue;
+                       }
+
+                       /* ctx load could be transformed into wider load. */
+                       if (class == BPF_LDX &&
+                           aux[adj_idx].ptr_type == PTR_TO_CTX)
+                               continue;
+
+                       imm_rnd = get_random_int();
+                       rnd_hi32_patch[0] = insns[adj_idx];
+                       rnd_hi32_patch[1].imm = imm_rnd;
+                       rnd_hi32_patch[3].dst_reg = insn.dst_reg;
+                       patch = rnd_hi32_patch;
+                       patch_len = 4;
+                       goto apply_patch_buffer;
+               }
+
+               if (bpf_jit_hardware_zext())
                        continue;
 
-               insn = insns[adj_idx];
                /* "adjust_insn_aux_data" only retains the original insn aux
                 * data if insn at patched offset is at the end of the patch
                 * buffer. That is to say, given the following insn sequence:
@@ -7580,15 +7626,18 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env)
                zext_patch[0] = insns[adj_idx];
                zext_patch[1].dst_reg = insn.dst_reg;
                zext_patch[2].dst_reg = insn.dst_reg;
+               patch = zext_patch;
+               patch_len = 3;
+apply_patch_buffer:
                memcpy(&orig_aux, &aux[adj_idx], sizeof(orig_aux));
-               new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, adj_idx, zext_patch, 3);
+               new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, adj_idx, patch, patch_len);
                if (!new_prog)
                        return -ENOMEM;
                env->prog = new_prog;
                insns = new_prog->insnsi;
                aux = env->insn_aux_data;
                memcpy(&aux[adj_idx], &orig_aux, sizeof(orig_aux));
-               delta += 2;
+               delta += patch_len - 1;
        }
 
        return 0;
@@ -8425,16 +8474,18 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr 
*attr,
        if (ret == 0)
                ret = check_max_stack_depth(env);
 
-       /* Instruction rewrites happen after this point.
-        * For offload target, finalize hook has all aux insn info, do any
-        * customized work there.
-        */
-       if (ret == 0 && !bpf_jit_hardware_zext() &&
-           !bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux)) {
-               ret = opt_subreg_zext_lo32(env);
-               env->prog->aux->no_verifier_zext = !!ret;
-       } else {
-               env->prog->aux->no_verifier_zext = true;
+       /* Instruction rewrites happen after this point. */
+       if (ret == 0) {
+               if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux)) {
+                       /* For offload target, finalize hook has all aux insn
+                        * info, copy the analysis result at there.
+                        */
+                       env->prog->aux->no_verifier_zext = true;
+               } else {
+                       ret = opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(env, attr);
+                       env->prog->aux->no_verifier_zext =
+                               bpf_jit_hardware_zext() ? true : !!ret;
+               }
        }
 
        if (is_priv) {
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to