On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:04:09 +0100
Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A question inspired by 0a25d92c6f4f ("dpaa2-eth: use netif_receive_skb_list"):
> kerneldoc of netif_receive_skb_list states that interrupts should be
> enabled.
Do notice that the exact same comment (and rule) applies to
netif_receive_skb() which also have below comment:
/* [...]
* This function may only be called from softirq context and interrupts
* should be enabled.
*/
> When used from NAPI context irqs typically are disabled.
> And if the NAPI budget is fully consumed then interrupts don't get enabled
> in the same NAPI poll loop. How is this supposed to play together?
You have misunderstood that is means that interrupts should be
enabled. It is talking about local_irq_disable/enable and
local_irq_save/restore. This is different from disabling the IRQs on a
given NIC RX-queue.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
