On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 07:29:30PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:03:51AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > I doubt this is the right solution. It certainly > > could fix this particular situation but my main > > point was packets shouldn't get into kernel > > receive queues with skb->dev not IFF_UP. > > I think you misunderstood. The device certainly is IFF_UP. What > happens is that the multicast spin locks are set up too late:
Could you explain? I can see some inet_rtm_newaddr interrupted. For me it could be e.g.: after vconfig add eth0 9 ip addr add dev eth0.9 ... before ip link set dev eth0.9 up Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html