From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.to...@intel.com>

When the umem is cleaned up, the task that created it might already be
gone. If the task was gone, the xdp_umem_release function did not free
the pages member of struct xdp_umem.

It turned out that the task lookup was not needed at all; The code was
a left-over when we moved from task accounting to user accounting [1].

This patch fixes the memory leak by removing the task lookup logic
completely.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20180131135356.19134-3-bjorn.to...@gmail.com/

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c1cb2ca8-6a14-3980-8672-f3de0bb38...@suse.cz/
Fixes: c0c77d8fb787 ("xsk: add user memory registration support sockopt")
Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.to...@intel.com>
---
 include/net/xdp_sock.h |  1 -
 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c     | 19 +------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
index 61cf7dbb6782..d074b6d60f8a 100644
--- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ struct xdp_umem {
        u32 headroom;
        u32 chunk_size_nohr;
        struct user_struct *user;
-       struct pid *pid;
        unsigned long address;
        refcount_t users;
        struct work_struct work;
diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
index 77520eacee8f..989e52386c35 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
@@ -193,9 +193,6 @@ static void xdp_umem_unaccount_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem)
 
 static void xdp_umem_release(struct xdp_umem *umem)
 {
-       struct task_struct *task;
-       struct mm_struct *mm;
-
        xdp_umem_clear_dev(umem);
 
        ida_simple_remove(&umem_ida, umem->id);
@@ -214,21 +211,10 @@ static void xdp_umem_release(struct xdp_umem *umem)
 
        xdp_umem_unpin_pages(umem);
 
-       task = get_pid_task(umem->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
-       put_pid(umem->pid);
-       if (!task)
-               goto out;
-       mm = get_task_mm(task);
-       put_task_struct(task);
-       if (!mm)
-               goto out;
-
-       mmput(mm);
        kfree(umem->pages);
        umem->pages = NULL;
 
        xdp_umem_unaccount_pages(umem);
-out:
        kfree(umem);
 }
 
@@ -357,7 +343,6 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct 
xdp_umem_reg *mr)
        if (size_chk < 0)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       umem->pid = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PID);
        umem->address = (unsigned long)addr;
        umem->chunk_mask = ~((u64)chunk_size - 1);
        umem->size = size;
@@ -373,7 +358,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct 
xdp_umem_reg *mr)
 
        err = xdp_umem_account_pages(umem);
        if (err)
-               goto out;
+               return err;
 
        err = xdp_umem_pin_pages(umem);
        if (err)
@@ -392,8 +377,6 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct 
xdp_umem_reg *mr)
 
 out_account:
        xdp_umem_unaccount_pages(umem);
-out:
-       put_pid(umem->pid);
        return err;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to