On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:41:35 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:23:27PM CET, j...@resnulli.us wrote: > >Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:24:30PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote: > >>Current port flavours cover simple switches and DSA. Add PF > >>and VF flavours to cover "switchdev" SR-IOV NICs. > >> > >>Example devlink user space output: > >> > >>$ devlink port > >>pci/0000:82:00.0/0: type eth netdev p4p1 flavour physical > >>pci/0000:82:00.0/10000: type eth netdev eth0 flavour pcie_pf pf 0 > >>pci/0000:82:00.0/10001: type eth netdev eth1 flavour pcie_vf pf 0 vf 0 > >>pci/0000:82:00.0/10002: type eth netdev eth2 flavour pcie_vf pf 0 vf 1 > > > >Wait a second, howcome pf and vfs have the same PCI address? > > Oh, I think you have these as eswitch port representors. Confusing...
FWIW I don't like the word representor, its a port. We don't call physical ports "representors" even though from ASIC's point of view they are exactly the same.
