On 2019/2/19 20:42, Walter Harms wrote:
>
> Am 19.02.2019 10:06, schrieb Mao Wenan:
>> This patch is to do code cleanup for ns83820_probe_phy().
>> It deletes unused variable 'first' and commented out code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowe...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v2->v3: delte unused variable 'first'; change subject from
>> "net: ns83820: drop pointless static qualifier in ns83820_probe_phy()" to
>> "net: ns83820: code cleanup for ns83820_probe_phy()".
>> drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c | 18 ------------------
>> 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
>> index 958fced4dacf..955d34a6f0d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
>> @@ -1869,34 +1869,16 @@ static unsigned ns83820_mii_write_reg(struct ns83820
>> *dev, unsigned phy, unsigne
>> static void ns83820_probe_phy(struct net_device *ndev)
>> {
>> struct ns83820 *dev = PRIV(ndev);
>> - static int first;
>> int i;
>> #define MII_PHYIDR1 0x02
>> #define MII_PHYIDR2 0x03
>>
>> -#if 0
>> - if (!first) {
>> - unsigned tmp;
>> - ns83820_mii_read_reg(dev, 1, 0x09);
>> - ns83820_mii_write_reg(dev, 1, 0x10, 0x0d3e);
>> -
>> - tmp = ns83820_mii_read_reg(dev, 1, 0x00);
>> - ns83820_mii_write_reg(dev, 1, 0x00, tmp | 0x8000);
>> - udelay(1300);
>> - ns83820_mii_read_reg(dev, 1, 0x09);
>> - }
>> -#endif
>> - first = 1;
>> -
>> for (i=1; i<2; i++) {
>
>
> the loop here seems also pointless, so you can eliminate i.
> (or did i muss something ?)
>
good point.Thank you.
> just my 2 cents,
> re,
> wh
>> int j;
>> unsigned a, b;
>> a = ns83820_mii_read_reg(dev, i, MII_PHYIDR1);
>> b = ns83820_mii_read_reg(dev, i, MII_PHYIDR2);
>>
>> - //printk("%s: phy %d: 0x%04x 0x%04x\n",
>> - // ndev->name, i, a, b);
>> -
>> for (j=0; j<0x16; j+=4) {
>> dprintk("%s: [0x%02x] %04x %04x %04x %04x\n",
>> ndev->name, j,
>
> .
>
