> On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:05 PM, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:53:48PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> info_linear = bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear(fd, arrays);
>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info_linear)) {
>> @@ -151,8 +165,8 @@ static int perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog(struct
>> perf_tool *tool,
>> machine, process);
>> }
>>
>> - /* Synthesize PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT */
>> if (opts->bpf_event) {
>> + /* Synthesize PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT */
>> *bpf_event = (struct bpf_event){
>> .header = {
>> .type = PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT,
>> @@ -165,6 +179,19 @@ static int perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog(struct
>> perf_tool *tool,
>> memcpy(bpf_event->tag, info->tag, BPF_TAG_SIZE);
>> memset((void *)event + event->header.size, 0,
>> machine->id_hdr_size);
>> event->header.size += machine->id_hdr_size;
>> +
>> + /* save bpf_prog_info to env */
>> + info_node = malloc(sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info_node));
>> + if (info_node) {
>> + info_node->info_linear = info_linear;
>> + perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node);
>> + info_linear = NULL;
>> + }
>
> what if the allocation fails? we don't care?
>
> jirka
My original plan is to just ignore it and accept that this program
doesn't have annotation. Any suggestion on what would be a better
approach?
Thanks,
Song
