Em Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:02:02PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu:
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2019, at 6:14 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Em Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 03:58:40PM -0800, Song Liu escreveu:
> >> Events with bpf_event should be considered as side-band event, as they
> >> carry information about BPF programs.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 6ee52e2a3fe4 ("perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT")
> >> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com>
> >> ---
> >> kernel/events/core.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> >> index 0a8dab322111..9403bdda5f8c 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> >> @@ -4238,7 +4238,8 @@ static bool is_sb_event(struct perf_event *event)
> >> if (attr->mmap || attr->mmap_data || attr->mmap2 ||
> >> attr->comm || attr->comm_exec ||
> >> attr->task || attr->ksymbol ||
> ^ here
how come, I looked after context_switch, that came before, have to
replace my glasses... :-)
>
> >> - attr->context_switch)
> >> + attr->context_switch ||
> >> + attr->bpf_event)
> >
> > What about attr->ksymbol?
> It is already included up there. attr->bpf_event was missed initially
> because we didn't use events with bpf_event but not ksymbol. With this
> set, the polling thread only has bpf_event, so we need this fix.
Ok, I'll get this one merged asap.
- Arnaldo
