On Thu 14 Feb 2019 at 20:34, Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:47:02 +0200
> Vlad Buslov <vla...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
>> As a preparation for using classifier spinlock instead of relying on
>> external rtnl lock, rearrange code in fl_change. The goal is to group the
>> code which changes classifier state in single block in order to allow
>> following commits in this set to protect it from parallel modification with
>> tp->lock. Data structures that require tp->lock protection are mask
>> hashtable and filters list, and classifier handle_idr.
>>
>> fl_hw_replace_filter() is a sleeping function and cannot be called while
>> holding a spinlock. In order to execute all sequence of changes to shared
>> classifier data structures atomically, call fl_hw_replace_filter() before
>> modifying them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vla...@mellanox.com>
>> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>>  net/sched/cls_flower.c | 85 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> index 88d7af78ba7e..91596a6271f8 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> @@ -1354,90 +1354,93 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff 
>> *in_skb,
>>      if (err < 0)
>>              goto errout;
>>
>> -    if (!handle) {
>> -            handle = 1;
>> -            err = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, fnew, &handle,
>> -                                INT_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -    } else if (!fold) {
>> -            /* user specifies a handle and it doesn't exist */
>> -            err = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, fnew, &handle,
>> -                                handle, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -    }
>> -    if (err)
>> -            goto errout;
>> -    fnew->handle = handle;
>> -
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>      if (fold) {
>> +            fnew->handle = handle;
>
> I'm probably missing something, but what if fold is passed and the
> handle isn't specified? That can still happen, right? In that case we
> wouldn't be allocating the handle.

Hi Stefano,

Thank you for reviewing my code.

Cls API lookups fold by handle, so this pointer can only be not NULL
when user specified a handle and filter with such handle exists on tp.

>
>> +
>> +            err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&fnew->mask->ht, &fnew->ht_node,
>> +                                         fnew->mask->filter_ht_params);
>> +            if (err)
>> +                    goto errout_hw;
>> +
>>              rhashtable_remove_fast(&fold->mask->ht,
>>                                     &fold->ht_node,
>>                                     fold->mask->filter_ht_params);
>> -            if (!tc_skip_hw(fold->flags))
>> -                    fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, fold, NULL);
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    *arg = fnew;
>> -
>> -    if (fold) {
>>              idr_replace(&head->handle_idr, fnew, fnew->handle);
>>              list_replace_rcu(&fold->list, &fnew->list);
>> +
>> +            if (!tc_skip_hw(fold->flags))
>> +                    fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, fold, NULL);
>>              tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &fold->res);
>>              tcf_exts_get_net(&fold->exts);
>>              tcf_queue_work(&fold->rwork, fl_destroy_filter_work);
>>      } else {
>> +            if (__fl_lookup(fnew->mask, &fnew->mkey)) {
>> +                    err = -EEXIST;
>> +                    goto errout_hw;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (handle) {
>> +                    /* user specifies a handle and it doesn't exist */
>> +                    err = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, fnew, &handle,
>> +                                        handle, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +            } else {
>> +                    handle = 1;
>> +                    err = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, fnew, &handle,
>> +                                        INT_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +            }
>> +            if (err)
>> +                    goto errout_hw;
>
> Just if you respin: a newline here would be nice to have.

Agree.

>
>> +            fnew->handle = handle;
>> +
>> +            err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&fnew->mask->ht, &fnew->ht_node,
>> +                                         fnew->mask->filter_ht_params);
>> +            if (err)
>> +                    goto errout_idr;
>> +
>>              list_add_tail_rcu(&fnew->list, &fnew->mask->filters);
>>      }
>>
>> +    *arg = fnew;
>> +
>>      kfree(tb);
>>      kfree(mask);
>>      return 0;
>>
>> -errout_mask_ht:
>> -    rhashtable_remove_fast(&fnew->mask->ht, &fnew->ht_node,
>> -                           fnew->mask->filter_ht_params);
>> -
>> -errout_mask:
>> -    fl_mask_put(head, fnew->mask, false);
>> -
>>  errout_idr:
>>      if (!fold)
>
> This check could go away, I guess (not a strong preference though).

Yes, it seems that after this change errout_idr lable is only accessed
from else branch of if(fold) conditional so the check is redundant.

>
>>              idr_remove(&head->handle_idr, fnew->handle);
>> +errout_hw:
>> +    if (!tc_skip_hw(fnew->flags))
>> +            fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, fnew, NULL);
>> +errout_mask:
>> +    fl_mask_put(head, fnew->mask, false);
>>  errout:
>>      tcf_exts_destroy(&fnew->exts);
>>      kfree(fnew);

Reply via email to