On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:36PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that all switchdev drivers have been converted to checking the
> bridge port flags during the prepare phase of the
> switchdev_port_attr_set() when the process
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS, we can avoid calling
> switchdev_port_attr_get() with
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index db9e8ab96d48..8f88f8a1a7fa 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -64,29 +64,27 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  {
>       struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>               .orig_dev = p->dev,
> -             .id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT,
> +             .id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
> +             .u.brport_flags = flags,
>       };
>       int err;
>  
>       if (mask & ~BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     err = switchdev_port_attr_get(p->dev, &attr);
> -     if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> -             return 0;
> -     if (err)
> +     err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +     if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>               return err;
>  
> -     /* Check if specific bridge flag attribute offload is supported */
> -     if (!(attr.u.brport_flags_support & mask)) {
> +     if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>               br_warn(p->br, "bridge flag offload is not supported %u(%s)\n",
>                       (unsigned int)p->port_no, p->dev->name);
> -             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +             return err;
>       }

I see that you return -EOPNOTSUPP from drivers in case of unsupported
flags. I believe this is problematic (I'll test soon). The same return
code is used by:

1. Switch drivers to indicate unsupported flags
2. switchdev code to indicate unsupported netdev (no switchdev ops)

I guess that with this patch any attempt to set bridge port flags on
veth/dummy device will result in an error.

>  
>       attr.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS;
>       attr.flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER;
> -     attr.u.brport_flags = flags;
> +
>       err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>       if (err) {
>               br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload flag on port %u(%s)\n",
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to