On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 20:09:53 +0000 Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote:
> A /0 subnet mask is theoretically valid, but ip route get doesn't allow > it: > > $ ip route get 1.0.0.0/0 > need at least a destination address > > Remove the check so that it can go through: > > $ ip/ip route get 1.0.0.0/0 > 1.0.0.0 via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 src 192.168.1.91 uid 1000 > cache > > Reported-by: Clément Hertling <wxc...@wxcafe.net> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > --- > Stephen et al, this was reported by a Debian user: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921737 > > It makes sense to me at a cursory glance, but sending as RFC as I'm > not 100% familiar with the route get function. > > ip/iproute.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c > index 5f58a3b3..d78f43d8 100644 > --- a/ip/iproute.c > +++ b/ip/iproute.c > @@ -2041,11 +2041,6 @@ static int iproute_get(int argc, char **argv) > argc--; argv++; > } > > - if (req.r.rtm_dst_len == 0) { > - fprintf(stderr, "need at least a destination address\n"); > - return -1; > - } > - > if (idev || odev) { > int idx; > You still need a way to report error for: ip route get (i.e when no address is present)
