On 09.02.2019 08:11, David Miller wrote: > From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 19:25:22 +0100 > >> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that >> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when >> populating the device list. If code needs this information it >> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device >> list. >> Because this bit doesn't represent a device don't define a >> MDIO_MMD_XYZ constant, just define a MDIO_DEVS_XYZ constant for >> the flag in the device list bitmap. >> >> v2: >> - make masking of bit 0 more explicit >> - improve commit message >> Andrew had few further review comments and based on that I prepared a v3, this time as series of three patches. What you just applied was splitted to two patches and patch 1 is new. But this shouldn't be a big deal. We can keep what was applied and I will rebase patch 1 and resubmit it.
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> > > Applied, thanks Heiner. > Heiner
