net/core/ethtool.c:3023:19: warning: address of array
'ext_m_spec->h_dest' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
                if (ext_m_spec->h_dest) {
                ~~  ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~

h_dest is an array, it can't be null so remove this check.

Fixes: eca4205f9ec3 ("ethtool: add ethtool_rx_flow_spec to flow_rule structure 
translator")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/353
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/ethtool.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
index 0fbf39239b29..d2c47cdf25da 100644
--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -3020,17 +3020,15 @@ ethtool_rx_flow_rule_create(const struct 
ethtool_rx_flow_spec_input *input)
                const struct ethtool_flow_ext *ext_h_spec = &fs->h_ext;
                const struct ethtool_flow_ext *ext_m_spec = &fs->m_ext;
 
-               if (ext_m_spec->h_dest) {
-                       memcpy(match->key.eth_addrs.dst, ext_h_spec->h_dest,
-                              ETH_ALEN);
-                       memcpy(match->mask.eth_addrs.dst, ext_m_spec->h_dest,
-                              ETH_ALEN);
-
-                       match->dissector.used_keys |=
-                               BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS);
-                       match->dissector.offset[FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS] =
-                               offsetof(struct ethtool_rx_flow_key, eth_addrs);
-               }
+               memcpy(match->key.eth_addrs.dst, ext_h_spec->h_dest,
+                      ETH_ALEN);
+               memcpy(match->mask.eth_addrs.dst, ext_m_spec->h_dest,
+                      ETH_ALEN);
+
+               match->dissector.used_keys |=
+                       BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS);
+               match->dissector.offset[FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS] =
+                       offsetof(struct ethtool_rx_flow_key, eth_addrs);
        }
 
        act = &flow->rule->action.entries[0];
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to