Make sense, I will send the new patch. Thanks for the opinion.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 1:25 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:53:16PM -0800, Yizhuo Zhai wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:52 PM Yizhuo Zhai <yzhai...@ucr.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, but why initialization matters here? Is performance the main
> > > concern?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:17 PM David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> From: Yizhuo <yzhai...@ucr.edu>
> > >> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:15:59 -0800
> > >>
> > >> > @@ -639,9 +639,14 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_set_syscon(struct
> > >> > stmmac_priv *priv)
> > >> > struct sunxi_priv_data *gmac = priv->plat->bsp_priv;
> > >> > struct device_node *node = priv->device->of_node;
> > >> > int ret;
> > >> > - u32 reg, val;
> > >> > + u32 reg, val = 0;
> > >> > +
> > >> > + ret = regmap_read(gmac->regmap, SYSCON_EMAC_REG, &val);
> > >> > + if (ret) {
> > >> > + dev_err(priv->device, "Fail to read SYSCON_EMAC_REG.\n");
> > >> > + return ret;
> > >> > + }
> > >>
> > >> I agree with the other reviewer that since you check 'ret' the
> > >> initialization of
> > >> 'val' is no longer needed.
> >
> > Thanks, but why initialization matters here? Is performance the main
> > concern?
>
> Not really, but if we turn this the other way around, why should we do
> something that doesn't bring anything?
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
--
Kind Regards,
Yizhuo Zhai
Computer Science, Graduate Student
University of California, Riverside
