Den tors 7 feb. 2019 kl 06:38 skrev Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net>: > > Holding mmap_sem exclusively for a gup() is an overkill. > Lets replace the call for gup_fast() and let the mm take > it if necessary. > > Cc: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> > Cc: Bjorn Topel <bjorn.to...@intel.com> > Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karls...@intel.com> > CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbu...@suse.de> > --- > net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c > index 5ab236c5c9a5..25e1e76654a8 100644 > --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c > +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c > @@ -265,10 +265,8 @@ static int xdp_umem_pin_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem) > if (!umem->pgs) > return -ENOMEM; > > - down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); > - npgs = get_user_pages(umem->address, umem->npgs, > - gup_flags, &umem->pgs[0], NULL); > - up_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); > + npgs = get_user_pages_fast(umem->address, umem->npgs, > + gup_flags, &umem->pgs[0]); >
Thanks for the patch! The lifetime of the pinning is similar to RDMA umem mapping, so isn't gup_longterm preferred? Björn > if (npgs != umem->npgs) { > if (npgs >= 0) { > -- > 2.16.4 >