On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 11:03:11AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:28:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:48:51AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Moni Shoua <mo...@mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > To avoid compatibility issue with older kernels the firmware doesn't
> > > allow SRQ to work with ODP unless kernel asks for it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Moni Shoua <mo...@mellanox.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Majd Dibbiny <m...@mellanox.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
> > > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mlx5/device.h | 3 ++
> > > include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
> > > index be81b319b0dc..b3a76df0cf6c 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
> > > @@ -459,6 +459,53 @@ static int handle_hca_cap_atomic(struct
> > > mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int handle_hca_cap_odp(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + void *set_ctx;
> > > + void *set_hca_cap;
> > > + int set_sz = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(set_hca_cap_in);
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, pg))
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > Should a
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING))
> > return 0;
> >
> > Be here?
>
> We had similar discussion in mlx5_ib main.c, but here we are talking
> about mlx5_core code, which from my point of view should represent the
> real HW capabilities without relation to kernel compilation mode.
This switch is to tell the FW that the mlx5_ib module supports the new
protocol - so having it in core code at all is really weird. I assume
there is some startup sequence reason?
Since the modularity is already wrecked it seems like an odd
reason not to add the if..
Jason
