On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:38 AM David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:31:18 -0500
>
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:39:41PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:58:07PM +0100, Tuxdriver wrote:
> >> > I was initially under the impression that with Kent's repost, the
> >> > radixtree
> >> > (which is what I think you meant by rhashtables) updates would be merged
> >>
> >> Oops! Yep.. I had meant flex_arrays actually.
> >>
> >> > imminently, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I'd really like to
> >> > know
> >> > what the hold up there is, as that patch seems to have been stalled for
> >> > months. I hate the notion of breaking the radixtree patch, but if it's
> >> > status is indeterminate, then, yes, we probably need to go with xins
> >> > patch
> >> > for the short term, and let Kent fix it up in due course.
> >>
> >> Dave, can you please consider applying this patch? The conflict
> >> resolution will be easy: just ignore the changes introduced by this
> >> patch.
> >>
> > Dave I concur with Marcelo here. Kent was very active in getting sctp
> > fixed up
> > to use radixtrees, but now he seems to have gone to ground, and for whatever
> > reason, no one seems interested in incorporating his patch. Its been
> > languising
> > for months, so I think we need to take action to secure sctp now until such
> > time
> > as his genradix changes finally move forward.
>
> I agree, please let's get this sctp patch resubmitted and back into
> patchwork and I will apply it.
reposted.
