On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:23 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:03:02 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> > The sysfs interface here is only a proof of concept. It provides a way for
> > the userspace applications to use the advanced QoS features supported by
> > d80211 stack. The finial solution should be switched to cfg80211.
> 
> So... what about implementing that into cfg80211? :-)

I agree, we should put this into cfg80211/nl80211 from the start. It's
not really hard to still have some things over WE and start using
cfg/nl80211 now.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to