On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-12-14 00:12 > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:01:43PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Loopback should be there before protocols are started. It makes sense > > > to have a standard startup order. > > > > This actually becomes easier after my patch: > > > > Now that it's untangled from net_olddevs_init(), you can simply change > > the module_init(loopback_init) to a different initcall level. > > Not really, the device management inits as subsys, the ip layer hooks > into fs_initcall() which comes right after. The loopback was actually > registered after the protocol so far. I think Adrian's patch is fine > if the module_init() is changed to device_initcall().
It doesn't matter (and I don't care) since for the non-modular case (that always applies for loopback), there's: #define __initcall(fn) device_initcall(fn) #define module_init(x) __initcall(x); cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html