On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 7:43 AM Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote:
>
> The BT coex event is not an error condition. Don't print an error
> message in this case. The same even in sta_event.c prints a
> message using the debug level already.

For some reason, that one (and a handful of others) uses dev_dbg()
instead of mwifiex_dbg() with an appropriate mask (e.g., EVENT). But
mwifiex_dbg() seems preferable for consistency.

> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannor...@chromium.org>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c
> index e86217a6b9ca..ca759d9c0253 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_uap_event(struct mwifiex_private 
> *priv)
>                 mwifiex_11h_handle_radar_detected(priv, adapter->event_skb);
>                 break;
>         case EVENT_BT_COEX_WLAN_PARA_CHANGE:
> -               dev_err(adapter->dev, "EVENT: BT coex wlan param update\n");
> +               mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT, "event: BT coex wlan param 
> update\n");
>                 mwifiex_bt_coex_wlan_param_update_event(priv,
>                                                         adapter->event_skb);
>                 break;
> --
> 2.20.1
>

Reply via email to