On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:38 PM <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com> > > In some case, we may use multiple pedit actions to modify packets.
just to clarify, this is a matter of choice, right? in other words, it doesn't buy you extra functionality > The command shown as below: the last pedit action is effective. and we are leaking some memory / HW (modify header instance) objects in the driver, as of that, right? this makes your patch a fix which should be labeled by "net" and not "net-next", same goes to the neigh update fix, would be good if you repost them with net labeling.
