On Jan 23, 2019, at 7:08 PM, Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Thanks for catching this! > > Although I think we should fix this in a different way. The problem > here is that the shrink cannot proceed because there was a previous > rehash that is still incomplete. We should wait for its completion > and then reattempt a shrinnk should it still be necessary. > > So something like this: SGTM. I can't test this right now because our VM server's down after a power outage this evening, but I tried a similar patch that swallowed the -EEXIST err and even with that oversight the hashtable dodged the reschedule loop. - Josh
