On 1/22/19, 10:05 AM, "Martin Lau" <ka...@fb.com> wrote:

    On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 02:20:52PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
    > As the last character of optval will be set with 0, so just copying
    > (optlen - 1) characters is enough.
    I am not sure this optimization is needed but I think it will
    make it more consistent with the bpf_setsockopt() above.
    
    Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
    
    Cc: Lawrence Brakmo <bra...@fb.com>

Acked-by: Lawrence Brakmo <bra...@fb.com>
    
    > 
    > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.s...@gmail.com>
    > ---
    >  net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
    >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
    > 
    > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
    > index 447dd1b..7a4de22 100644
    > --- a/net/core/filter.c
    > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
    > @@ -4262,7 +4262,7 @@ static unsigned long bpf_xdp_copy(void *dst_buff, 
const void *src_buff,
    >  
    >                   if (!icsk->icsk_ca_ops || optlen <= 1)
    >                           goto err_clear;
    > -                 strncpy(optval, icsk->icsk_ca_ops->name, optlen);
    > +                 strncpy(optval, icsk->icsk_ca_ops->name, optlen - 1);
    >                   optval[optlen - 1] = 0;
    >                   break;
    >           case TCP_SAVED_SYN:
    > -- 
    > 1.8.3.1
    > 
    

Reply via email to